Justice Chandrachud, heading a Bench with Justice Hima Kohli, said efforts are on to set up a national infrastructure where proceedings in all courts, from subordinate courts to High Courts and the Supreme Court, can be beamed live from a single platform.
Justice Chandrachud, heading a Bench with Justice Hima Kohli, said efforts are on to set up a national infrastructure where proceedings in all courts, from subordinate courts to High Courts and the Supreme Court, can be beamed live from a single platform.
“The Supreme Court is working hard to institutionalise live-streaming of court proceedings and frame a uniform and national model,” Chief Justice of India-designate, Justice D.Y. Chandrachud said on November 3.
Justice Chandrachud, heading a Bench with Justice Hima Kohli, said efforts are on to set up a national infrastructure where proceedings in all courts, from subordinate courts to High Courts and the Supreme Court, can be beamed live from a single platform.
The Bench was hearing a petition filed by advocate Mathews Nedumpara on live-streaming of proceedings.
Justice Chandrachud urged Mr. Nedumpara also to consult domain experts and lawyers who are technically proficient to make live-streaming across courts a reality.
Will have own platform to live-stream proceedings: Supreme Court
“We need a uniform framework for courts across the country… This has to be done as a national model,” Justice Chandrachud said.
The judge, who is also the chairperson of the apex court’s e-committee, said live-streaming rules have already been formulated and many High Courts have already adopted them.
Justice Chandrachud said High Courts in Orissa, Gujarat, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh and Patna have started live-streaming their proceedings.
In September, the Supreme Court had started to live-stream Constitution Bench hearings. It had taken the court about four years to implement its own judgment in the Swapnil Tripathi case, which had upheld live-streaming.
In that judgment, the court had said live-streaming would “virtually” expand the court beyond the four walls of the courtroom.
“Live-streaming of court proceedings has the potential of throwing up an option to the public to witness live court proceedings which they otherwise could not have due to logistical issues and infrastructural restrictions,” the court had said.
Justice Chandrachud, who was on the Bench which gave the 2018 judgment, had observed that live-streaming of proceedings would be the true realisation of the “open court system” in which courts were accessible to all.