The pleas have sought setting up of an SIT or a Commission of Inquiry (CoI) to look into the violence at JMI in December last year in relation to student protests against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA).
Lekhi, continuing his arguments from where he had left it on August 5, said that the police entered the campus with a “legitimate objective” which was to restore order.
Merely because the place was a university and people involved in the violence were students does not mean that that action taken by police was uncalled for, he said and added that any such contention was a “flawed argument”.
He said the university or any autonomous body cannot be seen as “terra incognita” (unknown territory) when such incidents take place.
He further said the batch of petitions have been filed by two sets of petitioners — one set comprising of those who were not affected by the violence but came to court based on news reports of alleged brutality by police and the other group was of people who were affected by the violence but did not follow the proper procedure for filing such matters.
He said that news reports cannot be relied upon as evidence as though they might be genuine, but they might not be accurate.
He also reiterated that there would be no entitlement to compensation to those injured in the violence, as sought in some of the petitions, as for that there has to be an admission of breach or a finding of wrongdoing by the police which are issues that are still being examined.
The ASG also said the petitions do not refer to the charge sheets filed in the matter and are entirely silent about them.
He further said that no enquiry as sought by the petitioners can be granted in the instant matter.
Lekhi will continue his arguments on August 21.